Wednesday, 20 May 2015

The mirror- Why must pop stars like Miley Cyrus and Ariana Grande dress like porn stars?

My daughter comes downstairs ready to go out for a family dinner. She is wearing a fluorescent-pink crop top and has her hair scraped to the top of her head in a gravity defying ponytail.
I then utter the words I swore to my 17-year-old self I would NEVER say when I had kids: “You can’t go out dressed like that!”
Yet my daughter isn’t 17 – she is 10.
She thinks she looks like her pop hero Ariana Grande but she actually looks more like Little Britain’s Vicki Pollard.
At the age of 10 she is not mature enough to process what looks good and how to put it all together.
And why should she be? At the age of 41 I am still making fashion mistakes I know I will live to regret.
But when pop stars whose careers are funded by the tween and teen market parade half-naked on the telly all the time, it is no surprise that their 10-year-old fans think dressing like that is normal.
No wonder kids are confused. Just five years ago Miley Cyrus was Hannah Montana, a wholesome country girl whose line-dancing routines my kids copied from the Disney channel.
Now, at 22, she is the self-styled bad girl of pop, posing provocatively on Instagram as a “sexy schoolgirl” in fishnet tights and a shirt open to her navel.

Then she rocked up to the Adult Swim Upfront Party in New York last week with a mankini barely preserving her modesty.
While no one can blame Miley for wanting to shed her wholesome image and prove to the world that she is all grown up, part of me wants to shake her and her “people”, and unleash a good old-fashioned sense of grown-up responsibility.
She may now be 22 but many of those little girls who watched her TV shows, bought her records and made her a millionaire when she was goody-two-shoes Hannah are still to hit their teens.
As a mum of two daughters, I am a proud feminist and believe firmly that women and girls can achieve anything and should be able to express themselves freely.
In fact, our family motto, much to my husband’s dismay, is borrowed from Beyonce herself: “Who runs the world? Girls!”
But along with achievement, expression and success has to come responsibility. Miley is a role model whether she likes it or not but I fear she is too busy being “grown up” to give that fact a second thought.
Let’s not just point the finger at poor old, misunderstood Miley. They are all at it.
Britney Spears went from the Mickey Mouse Club to launching herself into superstardom dressed as a lollipop-sucking schoolgirl in the video for Baby One More Time back in 1999.
But look how that ended up – failed marriages, losing custody of her children and a stint in rehab.
Yes, she is still coining it in Las Vegas and around the global money-making stadium circuit. But despite being a 33-year-old mum now, she is still falling back on shock and raunch.
At the weekend’s Billboard Music Awards she was prancing around on stage in a sheer catsuit with latex panels barely hiding a thing.

Why must pop stars like Miley Cyrus and Ariana Grande dress like porn stars?

Mirror feature writer and mum-of-two Amanda Killelea says the transformation of wholesome teen TV stars into chart sexpots is confusing our children

Bad influence: Britney, Iggy, Ariana and Miley
My daughter comes downstairs ready to go out for a family dinner. She is wearing a fluorescent-pink crop top and has her hair scraped to the top of her head in a gravity defying ponytail.
I then utter the words I swore to my 17-year-old self I would NEVER say when I had kids: “You can’t go out dressed like that!”
Yet my daughter isn’t 17 – she is 10.
She thinks she looks like her pop hero Ariana Grande but she actually looks more like Little Britain’s Vicki Pollard.
At the age of 10 she is not mature enough to process what looks good and how to put it all together.
And why should she be? At the age of 41 I am still making fashion mistakes I know I will live to regret.
But when pop stars whose careers are funded by the tween and teen market parade half-naked on the telly all the time, it is no surprise that their 10-year-old fans think dressing like that is normal.
No wonder kids are confused. Just five years ago Miley Cyrus was Hannah Montana, a wholesome country girl whose line-dancing routines my kids copied from the Disney channel.
Now, at 22, she is the self-styled bad girl of pop, posing provocatively on Instagram as a “sexy schoolgirl” in fishnet tights and a shirt open to her navel. 
Then she rocked up to the Adult Swim Upfront Party in New York last week with a mankini barely preserving her modesty.
While no one can blame Miley for wanting to shed her wholesome image and prove to the world that she is all grown up, part of me wants to shake her and her “people”, and unleash a good old-fashioned sense of grown-up responsibility.
She may now be 22 but many of those little girls who watched her TV shows, bought her records and made her a millionaire when she was goody-two-shoes Hannah are still to hit their teens.
As a mum of two daughters, I am a proud feminist and believe firmly that women and girls can achieve anything and should be able to express themselves freely.
In fact, our family motto, much to my husband’s dismay, is borrowed from Beyonce herself: “Who runs the world? Girls!”
But along with achievement, expression and success has to come responsibility. Miley is a role model whether she likes it or not but I fear she is too busy being “grown up” to give that fact a second thought.
Let’s not just point the finger at poor old, misunderstood Miley. They are all at it.
Britney Spears Hit Me Baby One More Time Video Screengrab
Schoolgirl: Brit in Hit Me Baby One More Time
Britney Spears went from the Mickey Mouse Club to launching herself into superstardom dressed as a lollipop-sucking schoolgirl in the video for Baby One More Time back in 1999.
But look how that ended up – failed marriages, losing custody of her children and a stint in rehab.
Yes, she is still coining it in Las Vegas and around the global money-making stadium circuit. But despite being a 33-year-old mum now, she is still falling back on shock and raunch.
At the weekend’s Billboard Music Awards she was prancing around on stage in a sheer catsuit with latex panels barely hiding a thing.
Then there’s Taylor Swift, who transformed herself from sweet and innocent country singer to a global pop phenomenon without barely a hint of scandal or naked flesh. Until now...
The video for her latest single Bad Blood opens with an ass-kicking Taylor in a latex bodysuit in a violent fight scene.
Then 25-year-old Taylor’s “girl-gang”, including Cara Delevingne, 22, Ellie Goulding, 28, and Selena Gomez, 22 – all hero-worshipped by my daughters – proceed to fight with rocket launchers and swords.
They might think it is all very 21st century girl power. I just think it is a bit predictable and unnecessary.fcom cleared ITV’s The X Factor of breaching broadcasting rules after thousands complained about sexy performances by Rihanna and Christina Aguilera before the 9pm watershed in 2010.
I am no prude but I have to admit I was uncomfortable watching with my children. I think that what youngsters are allowed to watch on TV should reflect what they are likely to see in real life.
Pop is not real life and therefore the people behind the industry seem to think there are no rules.
Yes, music is art and no one wants to stifle creativity. But when my kids are singing along in the car to Iggy Azalea, “Cause most guys only want one thing”, or to Robin Thicke, “I know you want it”, it makes me shudder.
Yes, Robin, the line is definitely blurred. My kids have no idea what the words mean but they are effectively children talking dirty.
People might argue it has been going on for years. Madonna, who is still writhing around on stage in fishnet tights and hotpants at the age of 56, practically used “sex sells” as a career plan from the outset. But Madonna never pretended to be a tween role model.But nowadays the pop career path seems to be: get a child TV star, build them a pre-teen fan base, turn them into a pop star, make them sexy and outrageous.
That might seem a perfectly plausible way to make a living in pop world but I doubt any mother would tell their daughters the way to get ahead at work is to put on a short skirt and a push-up bra and flutter those eyelashes.
Back in the 1980s, Madonna was one on her own – hidden between a bit of innocent Wham! or Bucks Fizz on Top of the Pops.
Now, watching pop music channels is a parenting minefield. My kids’ after-school club had to stop the children watching them as some videos were so explicit.
But that is not the only worry. Our kids can access horrific pornographic images at the click of a button online.
A survey found a quarter of kids had seen online porn by the age of 12 and experts fear exposure to such material can blur kids’ perception of what is appropriate sexual behaviour. Us parents have enough to worry about without pop stars adding to the burden.
Research shows that exposure to sexualised images like those in some music videos can increase the risk of young girls suffering eating disorders, low self-esteem and depression.
At the age of 10, my eldest daughter has already asked me if she is fat or thin – and that makes my heart sink.No matter how much we reinforce a positive body image at home, my girls are bombarded with so many images out of my control, many of them Photoshopped, that it is no wonder they are confused.
If grown women say that pictures of “perfect” celebrity bodies in the media cripple their self-esteem, then what hope have our children got?
The sad thing is that Miley, Britney, Taylor and co are all amazingly talented, bright, young women.
It is a sad reflection on us as a society that they appear to think being sexy is their biggest selling point.

Friday, 15 May 2015

Mental Health Issues- Katie Hopkins

Katie Hopkins has come under fire once again for making light of depression in a series of Twitter posts.
The motor mouth said people suffering from depression need 'a pair of running shoes and fresh air' and told suicidal people 'to top themselves in private' after Germanwings co-pilot Andreas Lubitz is thought to have deliberately crashed a plane into the French Alps.
First, she directed her tweets at Lubitz but it wasn't long before she aimed her barbed posts more widely.
"Sympathy for the co-pilot is making me angry. If you are suicidal, for goodness sake top yourself in private. Attention seeking b*stards," she wrote.
"People with depression do not need a doctor and a bottle of something that rattles. They need a pair of running shoes and fresh air."
She added: "Most depression is just genuine sadness at a social situation. Like being caught in torrential rain with a bag from Primark."
Her Twitter feed was soon flooded with furious comments saying she doesn't know what she's talking about and obviously has no experience with depression.
"Katie Hopkins is vile, her 'opinion' on depression is the many reasons why there's so much stigma behind the illness and asking for help," someone replied. 
Another wrote: "Katie Hopkins saying that depression isn't a thing and you'll just be sad for a bit is probably the least intelligent thing I've ever seen."
Meanwhile, a statement from mental health charity Mind says: “The terrible loss of life in the Germanwings plane crash is tragic, and we send our deepest sympathies to the families. Whilst the full facts are still emerging, there has been widespread media reporting speculating about the link with the pilot’s history of depression, which has been overly simplistic.
"Clearly assessment of all pilots’ physical and mental health is entirely appropriate - but assumptions about risk shouldn't be made across the board for people with depression, or any other illness. There will be pilots with experience of depression who have flown safely for decades and assessments should be made on a case by case basis."

Russia- National Identity- U2 Album propaganda- Homophobia the guardian

A Russian Duma deputy has asked Russia’s attorney general to investigate Applefor distributing “gay propaganda” to minors.
Alexander Starovoitov, a member of the rightwing LDPR party, says Apple spammed youths with illegal content when it released U2’s latest album, Songs of Innocence, to more than 500 million iTunes customers worldwide in September 2014.
Apple’s “gift” of free copies of U2’s new album to iTunes users triggered a significant backlash.. 
“I had this beautiful idea and we kind of got carried away with ourselves,” said frontman Bono, responding to widespread criticism of the automatic download. “Artists are prone to that kind of thing.”
The album cover in question features the band’s drummer, Larry Mullen Jr, embracing his 18-year-old son, Elvis, shirtless. The image was taken by photographer Glen Luchford, and the group says it is a visual metaphor for the album and its theme of “how holding on to your own innocence is a lot harder than holding on to someone else’s”.
But Starovoitov disagrees. He says the U2 album art promotes sex between men, and the newspaper Izvestia, known for its pro-Kremlin reporting, quotes Evgeny Tonky, a lawyer, who says he’s ready to sue Apple for compensation for moral damages on behalf of his own son.
If Apple is convicted of distributing gay propaganda to youths, the company could be forced to cease operations in Russia for as many as 90 days, or pay a fine of up to 1 million roubles (£13,000).
The album initially launched with different cover art, the two shirtless men only appeared later, when physical copies of the album went on sale.
In November 2014, following Tim Cook’s announcement that he is gay, a university in St Petersburg removed a monument to Steve Jobs and Apple. The decision was widely viewed as a direct response to Cook’s coming out.

Friday, 24 April 2015

Pride trailer


In the Pride trailer when some of the men throw bricks through the window there is the mise on scene of the mens performance looking angry as they throw the bricks, this shows the regional identity of being violent and discriminative against the minorities when we see the mise on scene of the victims reactions to having bricks thrown at them. The police are also represented negatively when they just stand and watch the men throw the bricks at the people they are protesting against, this shows the lack of power the police have over the people. Which gives the National identity of the country being a out of control place where criminals can get away with whatever they want to.

Friday, 6 March 2015

Ethnic Minorities- Stereotypes




              Negative- Storyville- India's Daughter


This documentary is focused on a famous gang rape case that took place on a bus in Delhi in 2012. The documentary talks about the life of the girl and how her life was cut short when she was attacked on her way home from the cinema. The men who raped her were young Indian men who believed that it was justified because a woman should not be out at that time. This creates a negative representation of Indian men because they are shown as dangerous as they have murdered a young woman and assaulted her male friend. They are continued to be shown as dangerous when footage of her parents talking about their daughter is shown, by repeatedly showing a positive side to the girl it makes us biased towards the girl who lost her life. They also use statistics in the voice over to convince us that Indian men are dangerous when they say that " A woman is raped in India every 20 minutes."This shocks the audience into feeling that India is a bad place for women and paints all of the Indian men as rapists. They construct the scene by then placing this footage next to footage of Indian women protesting against the violence that the men commit against women, It then uses mise en scene to show Indian men as dangerous by showing the men flipping cars over as well as knocking the women to the ground and beating them , this further proves that some of the men act this way towards the women and adds to the stereotype of the danger they bring.  The Hypodermic needle method is used to create a negative view on males and the power they have over the females as the girl's parents talk about the fact that male babies are celebrated and the female babies are not.  When the outside of the jail is shown non diegetic music that sounds negative is used to how us that we are about to see one of the rapists. Editing is used to create a juxtaposition between the positivity of her family to the negativity of her rapist saying that females are responsible for rape more than males.


Friday, 12 December 2014

Glee fight scene- case study

Santana and Rachel Fighting episode 100




In a recent episode of Glee called 100 in scene 13 two of the female characters Rachel and Santana are shown as being catty towards each other in this scene as well as being in front of everyone in the room, and are publicly humiliating each other for what feels like no reason at all. This  gives a negative representation of younger people to those who watch the programme because it shows that two young women are harsh and that younger people must not care about other people's feelings. These two characters are stereotypes with Santana shown as the popular bully who points out other peoples flaws and Rachel being the hardworking ambitious one. These stereotypes are shown clearly here with Santana telling the group all of Rachel's flaws just to prevent Rachel from getting something that she wants.

The camera starts with a mid shot from a lower angle which makes Rachel look like she is looking down on everyone around her, this shows that she is stuck up which yet again shows young people in a negative way, because instead of having someone who is ambitious shown in a positive way she is shown as negative.

Santana stands up but the camera does not show her face but instead a mid shot just showing her body this is so that she can look more dominant over those we can see that are sitting down near her. Mise en scene is used here to further the point that Santana is 'catty' because she is shown wearing a leopard print top. Cats are feisty and dominant creatures so this shows that Santana has power and is a strong woman. However yet again a strong woman is shown in a negative manner instead of being strong she is also a bully.  Santana is also wearing a red skirt, red has connotations of danger as well as anger.

The dialogue also shows the separate stereotypes of the girls, Santana says " you have sold half the people in this room down the river more times than I can count." This shows us that Rachel's character is negative and throws away friends to get what she wants. Therefore the girl who throughout all of the previous series has been seen as the innocent victim of bullying but yet her character is now being shown in a negative way to the audience. By having Rachel change from ambitious to overambitious is showing the hong audience that is bad to have dreams and to achieve them.







Friday, 28 November 2014

Survey analysis


Results from my survey:
I sent out a survey about magazines to every AS level Media Student so that I could determine what type of magazine I should create for my coursework. I created a survey asking a range of questions about magazines on SurveyMonkey. I got 18 responses on my survey overall. 


The first question I asked was their gender, I asked this question first so that I could easily see what gender prefers which magazine. Out of the 18 people that responded 8 were male. I can look at these 8 male answers to easily find out certain target audiences for whatever magazine I decide to do.

My second question was their age range so that the answers can go with how much they are prepared                                            to spend on a magazine, and whether they have enough disposable income to buy a certain magazine. 16 of my responses were from people 17 and under, one response was 21-29 and the other 50-59.

My next question was what type of magazine they usually bought. 6 people answered that they did not buy magazines so I will not include them in the rest of my results. 4 responses of the 12 were saying that their favourite type of magazine that they buy is fashion. One response was sports. 3 responses were music. 2 people were preferring film magazines. One person answered lifestyle and art and the last response was car magazines.

My next question was how many magazines they buy in a month. 4 of the 12 all bought these magazines once a month. 6 people bought magazines twice a month. 2 people buy 4 or 5 a month. 

Nine people are willing to pay £4-£6, three of these people buy multiple magazines which could show that they are in a higher socially economic such as c1 one and up. No one went lower than paying £1, this shows that the younger people such as the 17 and under's have a higher disposable income than older people. 3 people pay £1- £3 for their magazines and all three people buy multiple magazines a month. 

7 people are attracted into buying a magazine because of the main image that is shown. This shows that people may recognise the person on the cover or they may like what is shown on the main image and be interested in finding out about it.